Practice Areas

Follow us

If Excluding Time from CIRP Helps The Corporate Debtor To Revive Its Operations, Such Exclusion Must Be Allowed: NCLAT

[18 February 2022] The NCLAT Single Bench consisting of Justice M. Venugopal, Judicial Member held that if exclusion of time of CIRP helps to revive the operations of the Corporate Debtor and thus achieve the objective of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, such exclusion must be allowed.
The Appellant filed an appeal against the order of the NCLT, Ahmedabad Bench which refused to exclude a certain period of CIRP despite the Resolution being passed by 100% voting share of the Committee of Creditors of the Corporate Debtor for exclusion of the period of CIRP for further 90 days as the properties of the Corporate Debtor had not been detached by the CBI and ED due to Covid-19 pandemic.
The Appellant contended that exclusion of the 90 days period from the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor would save the company from liquidation. It was also contended that there was a Prospective Resolution Applicant, who submitted his Resolution Plan and there was a likelihood of revival of the Corporate Debtor.
The Tribunal accepted the contentions of the Appellant that these are exceptional circumstances and since the object of the Code is to revive the Corporate Debtor, the exclusion of 90 days period from CIRP should be done as it would help achieve the object of the IBC.

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/bighelpers/public_html/asialawoffices/wp-content/themes/justicia/framework/modules/blog/templates/parts/single/single-navigation.php on line 18